How we monitor NYC commercial mortgage maturities for brokers in 2026 (and why ACRIS makes it hard)

Key numbers. The Mortgage Bankers Association counts $875 billion of commercial and multifamily mortgages maturing in 2026 — 17% of everything outstanding — with another $652 billion in 2027. In New York City, we currently track 193,824 commercial loans across the four ACRIS boroughs, of which 26,210 are active and mature within twelve months of today. And the single most important fact about all of them: the public record that documents every one of those loans does not contain a maturity date.

This post explains where commercial mortgage maturity data actually comes from, what New York's records do and don't tell you, how we fill the gap without pretending, and how that turns into a list a broker can call.

Why NYC loan maturities matter right now

The national maturity wall is well covered. Two things make New York specific.

The first is the rate reset. Loans originated in 2016–2021 at 3–4.5% are coming due into a market where new commercial debt prices well above that — S&P Global puts the average rate on new CRE loans at 6.24% against 4.76% on the debt they replace. Every maturity is a decision: refinance at a higher rate, extend, inject equity, or sell. Each of those decisions needs a broker.

The second is the rent-stabilized book. Bisnow, citing Atrium's data, reports that lending on NYC rent-stabilized buildings fell 74% from $27.6 billion in 2019 to $11.3 billion in 2025, while delinquency on pre-1974 buildings rose from 3.7% to 11.5% in two years. Roughly $131 billion of debt sits on 852,000 units, much of it with regional banks whose books changed hands in 2023. Those borrowers face maturity with unfamiliar lenders — and unlike a trophy office tower, nobody is writing a news story about a 40-unit walk-up in Flatbush. It only shows up in the county record.

Active NYC commercial loans by best-available maturity year. Stated where read from the recorded document, otherwise the modelled term for the lender type. 2026–2027 is the local wall: 2016–17 originations plus 2021–22 bank loans on five-year terms.

For the securitized slice, Morningstar DBRS expects more than $100 billion of CMBS to mature in 2026 with over half unlikely to repay at maturity. But that's the slice everyone can see. In our New York cohort, identifiable CMBS is under 1% of maturing loans. Banks are 70%, private lenders and debt funds most of the rest. The broker market is the bank market — and bank loans have no servicer disclosure. The only public trace of them is the recorder.

Where commercial mortgage maturity data actually comes from

There are exactly three kinds of source, and they are not interchangeable.

Source	What it holds	Who it covers	Maturity?
County recorder (NYC: ACRIS)	Every recorded mortgage, consolidation, deed, satisfaction, assignment, modification	All loans, all lenders	No field. Only if stated in the scanned document
Securitization disclosure (SEC ABS-EE, agency)	Loan-level monthly data: balance, rate, DSCR, occupancy, servicing status	Public conduit CMBS only (~375 trusts)	Yes, stated
Trade press / vendor estimates	Deal announcements, "estimated" dates	Whatever got written about	Not a source of record

Every commercial mortgage data product is some blend of the first two, plus modelling. The differences that matter are which blend, whether the vendor tells you which dates are modelled, and how fast they notice a loan has died.

ACRIS mortgage search: what the records do and don't tell you

ACRIS — the NYC Department of Finance's Automated City Register Information System — is published as open data. The Real Property Master file lists every recorded document with its type, amount, document date, and recording date; Legals map each document to a tax lot (borough–block–lot); Parties give the borrower and lender; References cross-index later documents (satisfactions, assignments) to the instrument they act on. We've ingested 2,727,504 lifecycle events this way.

What ACRIS gives you for a loan: the amount, the date it was signed, the date it was recorded, the lender and borrower as recorded, the parcel, and the document type. What it does not give you: the term, the maturity date, the interest rate, the current balance, or whether the loan has been modified since — unless a later recorded document says so.

Five ACRIS quirks trip up naive pipelines, and each one produces wrong data in a specific way:

Loans are recorded as sets, not rows. A typical New York refinance is a CEMA: a gap mortgage for the new money, plus a consolidation agreement (M&CON or a large AGMT) that merges it with the prior notes into one loan. Take any single row and you either report the gap mortgage (far too small) or double-count principal across the set. We classify the whole recorded set: the consolidation instrument carries the loan amount, split notes are summed, and superseded notes are marked so they never surface as separate loans. In our data, 56,559 notes were superseded this way.

The document date and the recording date are different facts — and one of them is typed by hand. Recording trails signing by weeks, sometimes months, so a maturity modelled from the recording date can be off by a quarter. We use the document date. But the document date is keyed in by a clerk and ACRIS doesn't validate it: about one in two thousand mortgages carries an impossible year — 0200-09-04 for a note recorded in September 2008, 0106-03-10 for a 2016 CEMA — always the real year with one keystroke dropped and zero-padded. Left alone, those dates push a modelled maturity eighteen centuries into the past. We bound every date against its recording date, fall back to the recording date when the keyed one is impossible, and label the fallback as modelled rather than inventing a year.

Sub-$2 million Manhattan "mortgages" are mostly condo units. A citywide dollar floor either drowns the dataset in residential noise or drops real outer-borough commercial deals. We use per-borough floors ($2 million in Manhattan, $1 million elsewhere) and a parcel-level commercial verdict from PLUTO, the city's assessor dataset.

The "recorded borough" is the recording office, not the property's borough. This one silently deletes most of the outer boroughs. ACRIS tags every document with a recorded_borough, and it is natural to read it as "where the property is". It isn't — it's which register office processed the filing, and since e-recording took over, most Brooklyn, Queens and Bronx documents are processed through the Manhattan register. The share of parcels whose real borough differs from the recording borough, by year of recording:

Recorded in	Parcels in a different borough than recorded_borough
2004–2005	2%
2007	27%
2010	65%
2014	75%
2020–2026	55–68%

Filter by recording borough — as we did in our first build — and the Bronx appears to have had one commercial mortgage since 2025. The parcel's borough is the first digit of its tax lot (the BBL), so it is always recoverable; the county has to come from there, and the dollar floor has to be applied by the parcel's borough, not the office that stamped the document.

Satisfactions don't cite the mortgage's document ID — and most NYC loans are never satisfied at all. ACRIS's References file links a satisfaction to the loan it pays off by CRFN (the City Register File Number), not by the document ID that every other dataset keys on; older instruments are cited by reel and page. Match on document ID and you link a fraction of a percent of satisfactions — every "active" loan in your list stays active forever. The deeper trap is that New York borrowers mostly don't satisfy loans when they refinance: they consolidate them into the next CEMA, because a consolidation avoids paying mortgage recording tax again on the old principal. In a sample of 200 loans from 2010–2014 that looked active, only 36 had ever been cited by a satisfaction, but 174 had been cited by a later consolidation agreement. "No satisfaction on file" is not evidence a loan is alive. You have to follow every later instrument that cites the loan — by CRFN — and treat a consolidation as the supersession it is.

Estimated vs. stated maturity: how we label every date

This is the part of the method we think matters most, and the part most vendors don't disclose.

Because ACRIS has no maturity field, every maturity date in every NYC product is one of three things:

1. Modelled — an assumed term added to the document date. This is what "estimated maturity" means in practice across the industry, and it is where most products quietly pick one number. We don't: New York commercial loans are commonly 5, 7 or 10 years (3 for bridge and construction), so we keep every plausible term for the lender type — a filter for "maturing in the next 12 months" matches a loan if any of them lands there, and the row says which one ("≈ 5-yr"). The headline date is the most common term for that lender type: five years for banks, three for debt funds, ten for agency and CMBS.
2. Read from the recorded document — the scanned mortgage states the note's maturity, term, and often the rate. We read it with a vision model, keep only high-confidence extractions, and cite the document.
3. Stated in securitization disclosure — for conduit CMBS, the trust's monthly ABS-EE filing states maturity, balance, and servicing status.

Every field in Circlemark carries a provenance tier — recorded, public dataset, computed, extracted from image, or modelled — and the publishing rule is simple: a modelled maturity never renders as a fact. In the app it wears an ≈ marker; a stated maturity is bold and links to its document.

A loan whose maturity and rate were read from the recorded document: both render as stated facts with the document cited. A modelled maturity on the same page would carry an ≈ marker and a "term assumed" badge instead.

Here is what that honesty costs, in numbers. Of the loans we track, 2,672 have a maturity read from the recorded instrument. Plain mortgages state their terms about a quarter of the time; consolidation agreements almost never do — we read a 50-page CEMA end to end and found no maturity anywhere, because the amended note is an unrecorded exhibit. For those loans, the modelled date is the best any county-records product can do, and we say so rather than hide it behind a filter.

We think this is a genuine difference. Of the products we could verify, only PropertyShark labels its maturity dates as estimated on its own subscription page. Reonomy, Crexi, CoStar, and Actovia present a maturity filter without a published method. If a broker emails an owner about "your loan maturing in March" and the date was a guess, the broker — not the vendor — looks uninformed.

Keeping it current: the five guards

Stale data doesn't lose one lead; it disproves the product. In our own testing before these guards existed, a meaningful share of loans that looked active in the recorder had in fact been repaid, superseded, or foreclosed — 792 of them sat on collateral that had already been sold at auction. Email a broker about a loan that no longer exists and you've proven you don't have current data, to the one person whose job is knowing that. So the pipeline runs five guards every week, per borough:

• Satisfied. A recorded satisfaction or release, matched through References by CRFN and by document ID, removes the loan from the active set. Partial releases and partial satisfactions — a parcel freed from a blanket mortgage — are recorded as events but do not retire the loan.
• Superseded. A later consolidation (M&CON, or a CEMA AGMT) that cites the loan replaces it: the old note is folded into the new one and stops being a separate maturity. This is the normal way a New York loan ends, and it is the guard most county-record products don't have.
• Modified or assumed. A later modification declaration, assumption, or extension agreement flags the loan: its stated terms are superseded and must be re-verified before anyone cites them. 917 loans carry that flag today.
• Foreclosed. New York records foreclosure outcomes as ordinary deeds whose grantor is the court-appointed referee. We detect them by parcel; 1,516 loans in our book sit on collateral that was sold at auction, and none of them show as active.
• Distressed. Assignment of a loan to a special servicer, a recorded judgment against the parcel, or a deed-in-lieu to the lender flags a loan as distressed — the earliest signal the recorder offers before a foreclosure completes.

One limit worth stating plainly: lis pendens — the notice that a foreclosure lawsuit has been filed — lives with the courts, not the recorder, and the court system prohibits automated extraction. No county-records product has it unless it licenses a title-industry feed. Ours doesn't yet.

Turning maturities into commercial mortgage leads

The useful window is 6 to 18 months before maturity: early enough that the owner hasn't committed, late enough that the decision is real. The search is built around that:

• Maturity window on the best available date (stated if we have it, modelled otherwise, always labelled)
• Borough, property type, loan size, lender — including the lender's normalised identity, so "JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA" and "J P MORGAN CHASE BK" are one lender
• Loan purpose from the recorded set: purchase money, CEMA refinance, split note
• Distressed only — the special-servicer, judgment, and deed-in-lieu signals above
• Two LTVs: at origination where the loan financed a purchase, and a current proxy from the assessed value (labelled as a proxy, never an appraisal)
• Prospect score that peaks in the 6–18 month window and discounts modelled dates

Each row links to the property, every mortgage on it, the other properties on a portfolio loan (42,779 active NYC loans secure more than one tax lot — how to read them), and the provenance of every field.

List and map are two views of one query: pan the map and the list re-scopes to what is visible; hover a row and its point lights up; click a point for the loan.

How Circlemark compares

Only facts we could verify from vendors' own pages or published reviews; blanks mean we couldn't confirm.

	Source of maturity	Labels estimates?	NYC depth	Published price
Circlemark	County record + document extraction; ABS-EE in progress	Yes — per field, with citations	Four boroughs, all lenders, weekly	Early access
PropertyShark	ACRIS aggregation	Yes ("estimated maturity dates")	Strong	$59.95–$169.95/mo
Reonomy (Altus)	County records + CMBS overlay	Not disclosed	National	$400–$500/mo
Actovia	Recorded mortgages + agency/CMBS	Not disclosed	NYC-native	~$319–$389/user/mo (reported)
Crexi Intelligence	Public records + CMBS; rates estimated	Not disclosed	National	~$249–$299/mo (reported)
CRED iQ / Trepp	Servicer data	Stated (securitized loans only)	CMBS only	Enterprise

The honest summary: for securitized loans, servicer-data products know more than any county record can. For the 70% of NYC maturities held by banks, the county record is the only source there is — and the question is whether your vendor tells you which dates it made up.

Known limitations

• Most maturities remain modelled until read from a document, and CEMA notes are usually unrecorded. We label rather than guess.
• Staten Island (Richmond County) is not in ACRIS and is not yet covered.
• Modifications recorded without a cross-reference to the original loan are missed — the guard is only as good as the clerk's indexing.
• Lis pendens filings are not included (courts, not the recorder).
• Current balances, DSCR, and occupancy exist only in securitization disclosure and are not yet integrated.
• Borrowers are LLCs; contact resolution is a separate problem we're working on.

If you broker commercial refinancings or sales in New York, the search is open. Every number in this post is live from the same database — figures refresh hourly, and the methodology is documented in full.